Thursday, February 24, 2011

Smartwool Vendors Nyc

Counterfeiters in the Ministry

Just like about a month ago it was reported there were demonstrable defects in the thesis by Kristina Schröder (CDU) . As the Frankfurter Allgemeine writes that she had bought the help of a scientific worker of her father's doctor Jürgen Falter (political scientist at the Gutenberg University).

The name Gutenberg fits so perfectly with the next scandal Guttenberg. Fact is, he has in the past have always found a scapegoat, he can call to account:
  1. Kunduz attack: General and Inspector General were dismissed
  2. Gorch Fock: dismissal of captain
Behold, this time he can push the responsibility and no one throws away so his doctor title. The University of Bayreuth has finally decided yesterday after a brief investigation: Mr. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg must return to the track .

Anyone who has seen Mr. Guttenberg in the media, knows that he sets himself high standards. Words like "virtue, values, honesty may resign at any time the office" he had often expressed explicitly. Now, the obvious question of what happened here? Honesty? After this no more action. I myself have already written a thesis and will write again in the next six months, and white! as footnotes to be set. This is the A and O of a scientific work. To be honest: NO scientific work is perfect, error is human, but about 200 points? This is quite strange, right?

I would not speculate, but would it not stupid, so a work leave with all their mistakes yourself? I could imagine that a ghost writer has helped him . Probably was wrongly selected, or (to another to put it) bribed by the opposition:-D, and perhaps there is at this moment a battle of who he more pay, so he gives the secret of award or not.

in his place I would be ashamed of me and this time he is to blame for this farce . He threw away his Ph.D. after all just like that. Would do the people who put in alone seven years of her life in such a job?

After much consideration, I think: NO! The question to me is still in conclusion is: "What would you do in the free economy with such a liar?"

0 comments:

Post a Comment